
I’ve been doing a lot of thinking.
Happy Mothers Day! Many people have asked me if I’m still writing. The answer is yes! Right now, I’m working on a big article on the history of activism at my alma mater, Lehigh University. First, though, I’d like to post this email exchange I had with a reader – Gabriela Castillo from Australia.
GC – Was it at your intention to create endofcapitalism.com to educate your viewers to improve the current state of our economy under capitalism?
AK – I created the website The End of Capitalism in 2006, after I had written my Master’s Thesis on the subject at Lehigh University. My intention was, and remains to be, to explore the question of whether the global capitalist system is endangered by the combined social and ecological crises which capitalism itself has produced. My hypothesis is that it is.
GC – In what ways do you think capitalism is to blame for global warming?
AK – Global warming is a direct result of the massive, industrial, systematic combustion of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas. This systematic combustion of fuels provides the energy for the capitalist economy to function as it does. Coal combustion provides electricity, gas combustion provides heating, and oil combustion provides the transportation necessary to move the enormous quantity of goods and products which are pumped out of low-wage industrial centers in the Global South to consumers in the North.
Without fossil fuels, capitalism in its current form could not exist, which is why with Peak Energy looming, capitalism faces a very uncertain future. The only question, in my mind, is whether the capitalist economy will collapse fast enough or soon enough to avoid the most cataclysmic effects of global warming, which according to some scientists, could mean the end of the Earth as a livable planet. My hope is that this will be avoided, but only through a global democratic movement which re-orients society along the lines of social and ecological justice.
GC – Do you believe that mixed economies that have government involvement reduce the negative effects capitalism has in a social, economical and environmental aspect?
AK – So-called mixed economies, like Canada or Europe, can reduce some of the negative social and ecological effects of capitalism. This is fairly obvious if you look at the Gini coefficients, which measure inequality, of those countries as compared to the United States. Or if you notice for example in Germany or Spain where renewable energies like wind and solar make up a much larger share of their electricity production than the U.S. where coal remains king.
However, these measures are insufficient in at least 2 ways. First, because they still don’t fully empower the population to make democratic decisions about their resources, and how best to run their economy. Although Europe or Canada could be characterized as more democratic than the U.S. for example, they remain capitalist states, where corporations and the demands of the global market typically trump the less organized populace. Secondly, the position of those nations in the Global North remains predatory towards the majority of the world’s population in the Global South. They can provide great health care for their citizens and a high standard of living, but much of their wealth continues to flow in from much poorer nations in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, and this context must not be forgotten.
GC – In your opinion who or what upholds capitalism?
AK – This is a fantastic question, and not one that can be answered sufficiently in short form. Nevertheless, I will try to make it short and sweet. I believe there is a two-fold process upholding capitalism – the same two-fold strategy which holds up every system of abuse or oppression. It is a combination of 1) violent, deadly force (including forced poverty) or what we could call “the stick”, and 2) a well-orchestrated system of distractions and illusions, coupled with selective economic rewards for conformity – what we could call “the carrot”.
The U.S. remains the police force of this system since World War II, with the U.S. marines, CIA, or others willing to step in to disrupt non-compliant nations around the world, along with an endless stream of media distractions and propaganda produced by Hollywood and the rest of the U.S. media machine to pollute the minds of people around the world.
It must be stated that as in any abusive or oppressive relationship, there is also the tragedy of a certain level of participation in the abuse / oppression by those who are being victimized. We divide ourselves, or allow ourselves to be divided, along racial, gendered, sexual, or other lines. We adopt the outlook and belief system of the capitalists. We succumb to addiction and self-isolation rather than face the daily trauma and suffering of the world as it is.
GC – You state that capitalism is already ‘dead’ and transformed it self into a ‘zombie-capitalism’ what do you mean by this, if capitalism is dead then why do we still endure it’s negative effects in our environment and society?
AK – I don’t know if capitalism actually died in 2008, and has now been replaced by zombie capitalism, or whether it merely suffered a shock or heart attack and is now operating as if it is back at full health. Either way, I do believe that further shocks will be coming, and the system will inevitably collapse in the face of social and ecological limits to growth.
If it is a zombie though, that doesn’t mean it can’t still hurt us, or even kill us. It remains just as dangerous, and needs to be taken out and replaced by a global democratic system based on social and ecological justice.
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 8, 2016 at 6:06 pm
Hank
Not every ideology is necessarily, inherently, constructive or destructive. The manifestation of an ideology appears to lie in the hands of the interpreters and implementers. (Christianity in the hands of the crusaders and the inquisitors, Islam in the hands of dasch.)
Although our economy is supposed to be the relationship between the firms and the households resulting in a circular flow of capital, labor, supply and demand, Capitalism, as it appears to be currently interpreted and implemented, mandates that all economic entities (the firms, the households, as well as individuals) endeavor to concentrate as much wealth as possible in the hands of as few as possible. The more wealth an entity accrues the more able it is to manipulate the economy as well as the democracy thereby facilitating the greater concentration of wealth into ever fewer hands. This mandate to concentrate as much wealth into as few hands as possible has resulted, as we’re all painfully aware, in, among other things, inequity in the distribution of wealth and opportunity, as well as the destruction of the biophysical and geophysical processes of the Planet.
There exists a planetary operating system. Can Capitalism be reinterpreted to become the human operating system able to function sustainably and equitably while synthesizing with the planetary operating system?
May 8, 2016 at 9:22 pm
alex
Interesting ideas. If we had a global system which functioned sustainably and equitably, why would that be called capitalism? Wouldn’t that be something quite distinct? What definition of capitalism states that sustainability and equality are its prime motivations, or any motivation at all? Seems to me profit is inherently the only real motivation under capitalism.
May 9, 2016 at 10:42 pm
Hank
I agree. I asked the question as I did, “Can Capitalism be reinterpreted to become the human operating system able to function sustainably and equitably while synthesizing with the planetary operating system?” because, while it appears to me that the answer is no, I wanted to signal that, to me anyway, what we name an economic and political strategy which ‘functions sustainably and equitably while synthesizing with the planetary operating system’ is unimportant. If capitalists can alchemize this model from the lead of the prevailing system they can call it whatever they want.
What I hope is that as many people as possible, from as many economic and political persuasions as possible, acknowledge that the current political and economic dynamic is widely destructive and unsustainable and begin to seriously consider how and to what we might transition.
May 9, 2016 at 12:44 am
Paul Baker
Uncontrolled unregulated free market capitalism causes problems of inequality boom and bust is wasteful and damaging to the planet
it is not the answer never has been and never will be.
May 9, 2016 at 1:40 am
Marie Marshall
I thought you had died or gone to prison! Nice to see you back – I’ve missed you!
May 9, 2016 at 1:42 am
alex
Aww, that’s nice Marie! Glad to know you’re still out there reading!
May 9, 2016 at 3:43 am
Peter Lach-Newinsky
Great succinct summary of the core issues, Alex, so thanks, and keep up the good work. Peter
December 27, 2016 at 7:33 pm
Monte McKenzie
all of us need to focus on the fact that nobody willingly and without massive opposition will ever give up the bread and butter that feeds them. review every public demonstration in the news these past several years and you witness government violence against unarmed demonstrators.
Occupy was put down with massive violence and the ellegal use of police!
What do you expect to happen when the demonstrators retaliate in kind!
watch Chris Hedges late post about violence , Remember how sobering and disgusting the kent state shooting was !
The government is alwayse the first to use violence …justified by the pretence of protecting property.
I watched in disbelief at the government police and hired guards using water cannon in freezing weather and rubber bullets and earsplitting explosives to drive out protesters who were protesting construction of a pipeline that had never been approved for construction, on land that actually belongs to the native people who were most of the injured.
So just what should we expect when we demand elimination of fossil fuel systems and replacement with green energy!
How will Americans ever get rid of enviornment destroying waste by rich people who feel the have the right to their private airplane and yacht and vacation to ??? 2000 miles away or the near rich to use their 35 ft motor home vacation vehickle that gets 6 or less miles per gallon !
Our world must start making those decisions now not when the Greenland ice is gone!
How do we tell government agencies …this is our world and we demand it’s protection?
Peacefully?
Will the oil companies support us or ???
It’s not long now tell many of us are going to feel rubber bullets and more.
Monte McKenzie